House Beautiful
Home Building Magazine (Spring 1998).
Excerpt from
article “Strategic Planning.”
The
techniques shown here demonstrate three
ways to get exactly the home you want.
For
many people, building from a design they
selected or even helped create takes the
dream of home ownership a step further.
Those who buy pre-existing houses often
make do with less-than-perfect features
created for the occupants before them.
Homeowners who start from scratch,
however, can be sure that the house in
which they’ll live is planned to meet
their exact needs and wishes. While the
satisfaction that homeowners experience
after successfully building a house is
common to all, the path taken to reach
that point can vary considerably. In the
pages that follow we tell the stores of
three families who built their homes-
each taking a slightly different route-
from the ground up. One hired an
architect to custom design plans, one
built a house for which the plans and
many of the structural elements were
created at a factory and then shipped to
the building site, and one bought predrawn blueprints and modified them.
The method that will work best in a
given situation depends on the
individual goals and needs of the
homeowners. Read on for more details
about each technique.
Hire an Architect-
Located on a three-acre plot of land
that has been in the family for a
century, the house shown here is the
result of a close collaboration between
homeowner and architect. The owner, who
spent his childhood summers in the
small, simple early-‘60s house that
originally occupied the site, wanted a
new structure- but one that would recall
those fond memories. To translate his
highly personal vision into reality, he
called on architect Peter Cook of Peter
Cook Architects in East Hampton, N.Y.
With
views of the sea already blocked by
surrounding houses, Cook and his client
agreed on a one-story design that would
allow the kitchen and dining and living
rooms to flow together in an open plan
reminiscent of the original structure.
The idea for this sprawling floor plan
resulted in a long, low-lying building
with a distinctive roofline that serves
as the most significant architectural
element on the exterior. Marked by
pagoda-like peaks and deep overhangs,
the structure quietly resembles an Asian
temple. In addition to shading the house
from the sun, the 3’-deep eaves display
exposed structural details, enhancing
the visual richness of the building.
For the
interior space planning, Cook
intertwined the open design inspired by
the original house with the stylistic
thread established by the rooflines. The
combination created a subtle aesthetic
reminiscent of a Caribbean plantation.
High ceilings, originally relied on to
control heat in equatorial climates,
suggest the tropics, while rich, dark
mahogany molding and trim and
mahogany-stained beams recall the
furnishings that create an atmosphere
that could be found in “a
turn-of-the-century family house, with a
couple of pieces from the West Indies
helping to establish a summery touch,”
the owner says.
Cook
and MacDougall joined forces to
determine how to break up the visual
monotony that is characteristic of an
open, single-level floor plan. First,
they agreed to place the dining room and
the kitchen two steps above the living
room. And to further emphasize the
transition, they specified a shift from
the brick flooring in the living room to
wood in the dining room. A soaring
fireplace in the middle of the space
displays a custom-designed mantel and
provides another visual separation
between the living and dining areas.
Across
the house in the owner’s private
quarters, luxury reigns. Cook and
MacDougall also worked together here-
this time to orchestrate unusual
elements, such as a whirlpool tub tucked
into a glass-enclosed nook in the bath
and another custom-designed mantel for
the fireplace in the bedroom.
Also
for the bath, MacDougall specified tile
that extends across the floor and high
up the wall, fixtures that are elegant
period pieces, and plumbing fittings
that are left exposed to show off
gleaming steel and brass. The niceties
certainly add up.
As Cook
notes, “An architect brings attention to
detail, subtleties of scale, and
emotional involvement to every project.”
First and foremost, the professional
contributes experience and a resulting
ability to visualize ideas that a novice
doesn’t have. For example, when the
owner wanted a screen porch off the
kitchen, Cook pointed out that it would
block sunlight and suggested they locate
it off a guest room instead. Thought he
had his doubts, the owner agreed to the
plan and, now, the kitchen remains open
to a warming wash of daylight and the
guest room is a popular destination.
The end
result of this careful collaboration by
the homeowner, Cook, and MacDougall? A
satisfying mix that reflects the owner’s
very personal tastes and vision.
(inset) Why hire an
architect?
As is
evident from the fine details and
elegantly proportioned volumes in the
house featured on these pages, an
architect brings a highly-trained eye,
as well as a finely tuned creative
outlook, to the design process. Most
often, architects also remain involved
throughout the entire construction
process, choosing materials and
overseeing the builder until completion.
In architect Peter Cook’s words, “We are
able to stretch the limits. We can save
the client money by avoiding mistakes.
We can supervise contractors and keep an
eye on schedules and budgets.” Cook also
points out that houses designed by
architects are always more valuable at
resale. On a more fundamental level,
architects are trained to help their
clients define goals, understand
construction techniques and costs, and
in the end, translate dreams into
reality. The primary drawback of using
an architect is financial- architects
commonly charge a fee ranging from 10 to
20 percent of construction costs.
Whether they rely on this or another
rate- fixed by square footage or hours-
the additional expense can multiply.
By Justin Henderson